View Single Post
  #56   Report Post  
Old April 15th 10, 06:45 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway,alt.radio.digital
E27002 E27002 is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 209
Default 21-storey skycrapers get go-aheadat Finsbury Park - Press

On Apr 15, 9:26*am, tony sayer wrote:
No we haven't, vested interests came along and ruined it. Freeview has
been buggered up by putting on so many channels that half of them look like
a live report from Legoland as soon as anyone moves because of the mpeg
blocking artifacts. Even the main BBC channels can't cope with highly
mobile scenes such as running water or sea surf without noticable blocks
appearing in the picture. Compared to a decent PAL transmission it looks
utter ****.


B2003


Thanks for sharing. *I had no idea. *Here in Reno I receive digital TV
thru the Cable system. *The quality is outstanding. *I don't have a
need to go for Hi Def. *I figuered that, if anything, digital quality
in the UK would be better. *The old analogue signal was certainly
better in the UK.


Better then digital in the UK?.


What I meant was that the UK, PAL, Analogue signal was, IMHO, always
superior to the US, NTSC, Signal. Although in the latter years of
NTSC broadcasters seemed to have cleaned it up somewhat.

And where are the digital pix sourced from on your cable system?..

All US TV is now digital. I do not know how the local TV stations
deliver their signal the Cable Company. It may be over the air.
But, I rather suspect they use some sort of direct feed, or
Satellite. Other services, like A&E, AMC, Bravo, TMC, etc are
certainly received from Satellites.