View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 9th 10, 09:43 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Steve Fitzgerald Steve Fitzgerald is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 627
Default 2009 stock (again)

In message
, MIG
writes

Isn't the same true of the 1974 stock? They're designed for leaning,
not for sitting.


1974? The bum perches in other stocks and pretty much flush up against the
wall with maybe a few inches behind. These things have about 9 inches of
wasted space behind them. Its the same story throughout the interior.


I meant 1973. Which, following extensive testing this morning, I can
confirm has space behind the bum rest, but it's too high up to
actually sit on.

Perhaps the reason the panel below the perch is so tall and thick is
that is has some sort of equipment in it?


But they are a recent addition, probably late 1990s. It's not their
original layout.


Before my time but didn't they appear at refurbishment when windows were
cut in the ends of the cars?
--
Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building.
You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK
(please use the reply to address for email)