View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Old June 28th 10, 07:05 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Graeme[_2_] Graeme[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 200
Default Loogahgbaroogah

In message
MIG wrote:

On 27 June, 12:44, Chris Tolley (ukonline
really) wrote:
MIG wrote:
Overgeneralisation can also be a problem.


Indeed. It's illegal in Scrabble.
--http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p13309759.html
(66 410 at Winwick, 10 Mar 2005)


Well, it's too long for the Collins Scrabble Checker, which accepts
both overgeneralise and generalisation. I am not sure what to make of
the length limit. Does it imply a rule, or is it just the limits of
the checker? Not rejected anyway; just can't be entered.


Will it fit on the board?

--
Graeme Wall

This address not read, substitute trains for rail
Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/