In message
Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 13:16:51 on Thu,
22 Jul 2010, Graeme remarked:
Err, you haven't actually stated any reasons so how can T5 have different
reasons?

I'm trying to head off the people who say "but T5 is such an
improvement".

In my recent experience it is definitely an improvement over T3 but the
point is you haven't stated how the reasons are different.

T5 is difficult to get around,

Not in my experience but perhaps we have different perceptions of these
things. T3 is a pig to get around and is very claustrophobic. Haven't used
T1/2 for years so can't comment on them.

even if it's cleaner and a little less overcrowded.

--
Graeme Wall

This address not read, substitute trains for rail
Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/