View Single Post
  #196   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 10, 10:15 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Jeff[_2_] Jeff[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Default 'Ending' "the war on the motorist"

On Aug 2, 3:20*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:00:49 +0100



Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
* wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Jeff wrote:
It doesn't matter what harm he was doing. Potential damage is of some
concern though. Breaking the law is always a concern. It's strange
that some people think they should have the right to choose which laws
they break.


Oh give it a rest. The law is impotent if it doesn't have common consent and
the majority ignore it.


Are you going to take a similar view to bikes jumping red lights?


If not, what's the difference?


Traffic lights exist to prevent gridlock. Average speed cameras exist to
raise revenue for the treasury.

B2003


No. They exist to try and enforce speed limits. If people choose to
make voluntary payments to HMG because they choose to break a speed
limit that's their business - and my business if it puts me in any
danger at all.