In message , Dave Newt
writes
"Richard J." wrote:

The fact that something is worthy of attention doesn't make it valid. You
said it was "a valid form of visual expression". Frankly I find that a
shocking and irresponsible remark for an LU employee to make. Perhaps
we're using different meanings of "valid". I thought you meant legitimate
or acceptable.

The words "legitimate" and "acceptable" are just as open to
interpretation as "valid".

Indeed, I could have said that graffiti was a legitimate form of
expression but it wouldn't be valid in any legal sense ;-)
--
Kat Me, Ambivalent? Well, yes and no.