In message
MIG wrote:

On Nov 23, 10:40*pm, Arthur Figgis
wrote:
On 23/11/2010 09:04, Chris Tolley wrote:

MIG wrote:

The newsreaders just keep on dumbly reading it out every half hour.
You'd think that the London travel newsroom would have some vague
idea about transport in London.

Would you? Why? Do you think it is a requirement for people who mention
London in the things they read out to be Londoners?

Could be interesting for the shipping forecast...

I'd expect whoever organises the shipping forecast to know something
about shipping and weather,

As far as the broadcast is concerned you don't have to know about either. It
is a set formula that hasn't been changed in 70 years or more.[1] The hard
bit is actually reading it! The organisation is done by the Met Office. By
analogy it is not unreasonable for the BBC to expect whover supplies the rail
information to apply the same dilligence to their reports.

[1] Apart from adding a couple more sea areas about 30 years ago.

--
Graeme Wall

This address not read, substitute trains for rail
Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/