Thread
:
Why no assigned platforms?
View Single Post
#
22
March 4th 11, 11:12 PM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Why no assigned platforms?
In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:
On 4 Mar 2011 15:06:45 GMT, Huge wrote:
On 2011-03-04, Tristan Miller wrote:
I used the Deustche Bahn for
years when I was working in a German city, and while delays were not
uncommon, platform changes were almost unheard of. I can't think of
a single occasion on which my train departed from a platform other
than the one listed on my ticket, even when I had bought the ticket
days or weeks in advance.
As opposed to FCC at Bedford, who spend most mornings playing what I
call "Platform Roulette". I think they do it just to **** people off.
Err why do you think FCC decide the platforms? Surely it is Network
Rail who signal the trains / set the routes into the platforms? The
drivers simply do what the signals say - providing it is safe of
course!
FCC are sometimes responsible for changes of platform. I get the 15:15
from the Cross to Cambridge fairly regularly. It normally goes from
platform 9 in the current timetable. Having checked with staff at the
information desk I arrived at platform 9 one afternoon a week or two ago,
checked with the barrier staff who confirmed that the train in 9 would
form the 15:15, checked with a cleaner who said the same and spoke to the
driver who also said it would be the 15:15.
However, just after speaking to him we heard an announcement that the
15:15 would be going from platform zero, as the announcers put it. He was
as surprised as I was!
It turned out that FCC had decided to swap units around between the 15:06
and the 15:15. They left late given how little time passengers were give
to get to them.
--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]