View Single Post
  #36   Report Post  
Old June 17th 11, 06:56 PM
Robin9 Robin9 is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce[_2_] View Post
Charles Ellson wrote:
"Transport for London
Henlys Corner

We are carrying out major improvements to the busy Henlys Corner
junction, at the intersection of the A406 North Circular Road and A598
Finchley Road/Regents Park Road.

The scheme will improve crossing facilities for pedestrians and
cyclists and ease traffic congestion.

There will be new signal-controlled pedestrian- and cyclist-crossing
facilities as well as a new junction design to improve traffic flow."
[
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/proj...es/11571.aspx]


A huge opportunity - missed.

What is desperately needed at this junction, where three extremely
busy roads (A1, A406 North Circular Road, A598 Finchley Road) cross,
is grade separation. There was enough land available, thanks to
compulsory purchase of the Henly's car dealership, and grade separated
schemes for this site have been looked at in detail in the past.

However TfL allowed the (understandably) negative views of a few local
residents to over-ride the need for a scheme that would benefit the
tens of thousands of people who use this junction every working day.

The result is a barely improved junction that adds very little
capacity. It also wastes the land that could have been used for a
properly considered grade separated scheme, either with a flyover for
the A406 or a less intrusive but more expensive underpass.
The original scheme devised by The Department Of Transport in the good old days before we had TfL inflicted upon us did involve grade separation of the three main flows of traffic.

The A1 was to go underneath in a tunnel, the A406 was to retain its current course and above, as at Brent Cross, there was to be an elevated roundabout into which the A598 would feed directly. It was in preparation for this scheme that Henly's Garage was moved and the land acquired.

I think you underestimate TfL's determination to prevent real improvements from ever taking place. It wasn't that they allowed themselves to be influenced by a few nay-sayers. They actively sought them out in order to have a pretext for their wasteful scheme. This is standard practice by unscrupulous public bodies.

On any subject under the sun there is always a handful of cranks with a perverse opinion. If a public body wants to do something that the vast majority of people oppose, the trick is to seek out the cranks, ne'er-do-wells and utterly selfish people who don't give a damn for the public interest and then claim that these people represent the majority.

Last edited by Robin9 : July 19th 11 at 05:48 PM