London Banter - View Single Post - A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?

Arthur Figgis

On 26/08/2011 19:58, d wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:06:06 +0100
Arthur wrote:
On 26/08/2011 10:56, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 10:13, d wrote:
So whats your solution then? Swing the pendulum so far the other way that
it alienates white heterosexuals?

You got any evidence that white heterosexuals as a group feel alienated
by tolerance of others?

The comments section of the Daily Mail website?

It does make me laugh how people still think implying someone is a Daily Mail
is some kind of knock out punch. As if those limp wristed apologist rags The
Guardian and Observer are bastions of rational considered thought and opinion.
Most of the lentil munching journalists there wouldn't recognise rationality
if it kicked them in their organic nuts.

Is the Guardian actually written (rather than read) by lentil-munchers?
On the admittedly rather small sample of a bloke I once a met on a
Eurostar and someone I knew at university, the Daily Mail isn't written
(entirely?) by foaming-at-the-mouth loonies in black shirts.

I suspect most of the Mail and Guardian journalists could switch papers
and re-slant their stories to suit the different audience with ease.
(what's the old one about The Sun - "Hero saves baby from mad dog"; The
Times - "Man rescues child from dog attack"; Daily Mail - "Immigrant
kills much-loved family pet").

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK