On 04/01/2012 09:57, Comrade Willms wrote:
Am 03.01.2012 18:56, schrieb Graham Nye:

Why would Recliner want to deny writing that?

I don't care for the motives, only for the facts: he did deny it.

It's an entirely reasonable thing to have written in its context,
which was discussion of a state-owned railway company.

I have the opposite opinion thinking that it is absolutely
ridiculous. As you might have noted.

I note that you've asserted your view that having a state government take
over 100% of the ownership of a company doesn't change the nature of that
company. I've further noted you wriggling out of all attempts to engage
you in substantive discussion of that view.

It is you who has sought to move the goal posts by introducing discussion
of one-person owned businesses,

No, ...

Yes, in message-id
dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:42:23 +0100

...presumably so you can wriggle out of
answering Recliner's question to you: "Do you think workers' rights are
better protected in North than in South Korea?"

Did he write that? I don't know,

Yes he did. You should know that because he wrote that in the message
you replied to with the message-id already given above. More evasion
from you.

... but this is obviously far off topic
from the issues we are discussing.

It's OK then for you to give your thoughts on German state ownership in two
UK newsgroups but all of a sudden it becomes off-topic? Questions becoming
too awkward for you?

Or do you have a problem with the
Thought Police working for the Ministry of Truth, so that you have to
prove to be a good fink denouncing all possible thought crimes?

The Thought Police are obviously close to your mind, as you've mentioned
them twice this morning.

I note you have again evaded answering the question posed to you.
So, third time lucky, do you think workers' rights are better protected
in North than in South Korea?


--
Graham Nye
news(a)thenyes.org.uk