View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 7th 12, 07:02 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
Neil Williams Neil  Williams is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 212
Default First rule of politics: If your opponent has a great idea, copy it!

On Feb 7, 8:50*am, Arthur Figgis wrote:

I'm not sure that having a third TOC which runs trains into both
Liverpool Street and Marylebone (or whatever) would be necessary for
getting through bus tickets.


True.

Getting NS to accept passengers kicked off DB buses which stop short
would be a good start.


Assuming you mean in London, that is already possible *if* the bus
changes its destination after you've boarded. If a driver fails to do
it they should be reported for being lazy and neglect of duty.

I think, however, that whether the bus has terminated short should be
irrelevant. There should be a through single fare from any part of
London to any other part of London by any mode, its cost being
determined by the zones crossed, and *only* the zones crossed, nothing
else. It should probably be around the level of the current Tube fare
set. For bus only (as there is an advantage with an overcrowded Tube
of keeping people on buses; this does not exist in most other cities)
there should be again one single fare for a bus journey of any length
in London regardless of whether that involves one, two or ten buses.

There is an argument that this causes pass-back fraud. But if you did
it on Oyster, it couldn't.

Being able to change buses would be nice. But who cares about the bus
passengers who actually /pay/? Chances are they aren't the Poorest +
Most Vulnerable Members of Society.


Quite.

Neil