In article yZ1%b.19786$ft.13786@newsfe1-win, MetroGnome
writes
"Jack Taylor" wrote:

Try reading the follow-ups before going into an apoplectic rant.

I read all the follow-ups (at least, all that appeared on my server) before
replying.

I'm aware of the suggestion that there *might* not be a survey (with some
sort of revenue/track access bartering agreement being used instead) - but
as far as I can see, this wasn't confirmed. Hence, I began my comments with
the phrase "Assuming that an annual passenger survey is indeed used" -
clearly showing that the following comments only applied if a survey *was*
used.

I don't consider that pointing out the flaws in your logic constitutes a
rant.




Well Metrognome you're wrong. All the revenue from Amersham southwards
to (I believe) Harrow goes to LU who in return give Chiltern access to
their 'metals.'

All the revenue north of Amersham goes to Chiltern.

Now shut up.
--
Andrew
Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this
communication can not be guaranteed.
Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not
associations or companies I am involved with.