On May 24, 12:27*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:48 GMT

Jethro_uk wrote:
involved - it rather gives the impression the police can kill with
impunity.

What , you mean "innocent" people such as that gun carrying ganster scum
like Mark Duggan? If the police shot more people like him it might improve
the lives of the law abiding living in places like Tottenham. Machine gunning
any more rioters would help too as you could get rid of 90% of the scum in
one go.

B2003

I take it you mean the Mark Duggan who was proved to be unarmed, and
who was killed by a shot from police scum who then lied about the
circumstances. They claimed that one of their men had been fired at
by Mr Duggan, but a round found embedded in a police radio was proved
to have been fired from a police weapon. I take it that you would
have no objection to the police killing you and then lying about the
circumstances if they choose to do so?

They also lied about the Brazilian electrician, he did not vault over
the ticket gates, and the last time I looked vaulting over ticket
gates wasn't a capital offence in this country.

They also lied about the man who died, though probably not as a direct
result of, being pushed over by them during a demonstration in which
he was not taking part in London.

The British police are lying, cheating, dishonest, corrupt scum, and I
wish people would open their eyes and see this for themselves.

May I also point out the four who it was announced yesterday are
accused of various wrongdoing. What bout the numerous reports of
police wrongdoing almost weekly? Why do we almost never hear the
outcome of these, one way or the other? If these reports are untrue
then surely the subjects of them are entitled to have this fact made
public. If the reports are true, of if the events are known to be
true because we have personally experienced or witnessed them, then we
are perfectly entitled to call them scum.