Mait001 wrote:

Whilst I agree, Dan, that 4 t.p.h. is hardly anything to boast of, just what
purpose is served by expensive rebranding anyway? Why not spend the money on
actual service improvements rather than window-dressing?

Marc.

I meant the "brand" of the suburban railways relating to how they are
perceived etc, not the "branding" on the side of stations etc. Apologies
for my ambiguity!

A proper "rebranding" exercise in this case would be a massive
restructuring and building exercise, which I think you generally agree with!

Dan (a long suffering South London "train" traveller)