Thread: Thank you LU
View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old September 11th 13, 09:50 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Mike Bristow Mike Bristow is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 464
Default Thank you LU
In article ,
d wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:22:38 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote:
So your approach would give you a 3TPH service. And the impact
will occur on two occasions, once while the engineers fiddle
with the s/b track, and once while the fiddle with the n/b.

While there are some parts of the network that could survive on a
3TPH service, I don't think that any of it is in zone 1.

Right, because a 0 TPH service is a so much a better solution.

A 20 bus/hour service would probably be better than a 3tph service.

Oh look, that's what they do.

--
Mike Bristow

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote