London Banter - View Single Post

[email protected] · September 12th 13, 02:15 PM posted to uk.transport.london

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:50:06 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
d wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:22:38 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote:
So your approach would give you a 3TPH service. And the impact
will occur on two occasions, once while the engineers fiddle
with the s/b track, and once while the fiddle with the n/b.

While there are some parts of the network that could survive on a
3TPH service, I don't think that any of it is in zone 1.

Right, because a 0 TPH service is a so much a better solution.

A 20 bus/hour service would probably be better than a 3tph service.

In central london? You're having a laugh. Buses are a joke. Last time I
took one any distance it took about 4 times longer than the tube.

Oh look, that's what they do.

And the reason they couldn't do both is....?

--
Spud