CrossRail or CrossConnections? Guns or butter?
In article , Colin McKenzie
wrote:
Gary Jenkins wrote:
I'm not sure a tube type service off peak is really needed. Moving
from four to six trains an hour, as the Strategic Rail Authority is
currently suggesting, seems to be a lot of investment for
comparatively little benefit. It shouldn't be beyond the wit of most
people to plan their journey to cope with four evenly spaced trains an
hour, at the same times past each hour. If someone does just turn up
on spec then a maximum wait of 15 mins isn't that much worse than one
of ten minutes.
Oh dear. You've made the classic mistake of people who plan these
frequencies. What you are describing is a line. What we need is a
network. As soon as your journey involves a change, 4 tph is
inadequate on short-distance services. Even if both services are 4
tph, if you have a deadline you have to plan on a 15 minute delay at
the connection - in a journey where you might only spend 15 minutes
moving. This is not the way to compete with the car.
Colin McKenzie
I 100% agree
Michael Bell
--
|