Thread
:
So that's Heathrow getting the new runway then
View Single Post
#
4
April 10th 15, 04:54 PM
Robin9
Senior Member
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Recliner[_3_]
Robin9
wrote:
David Cantrell;147853 Wrote:
Gatwick might as well give up its campaign to get the new runway
instead
of Heathrow, because it's on top of an oil field. It must now be
apparent that Sussex is harbouring weapons of mass destruction and will
shortly be bombed back into the stone age, although by pure coincidence
the Oil Ministry will be completely untouched and will be carefully
guarded by the invading US troops.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32229203
--
David Cantrell | top google result for "internet beard fetish club"
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity
-- Hanlon's Razor
Stupidity maintained long enough is a form of malice
-- Richard Bos's corollary
Yes, I heard this being discussed at length on various radio stations
this morning. The consensus was that this is a significant oil field but
that only a small percentage will ever be extracted.
Around 10% or so?
Some estimates were even lower: around 5%. Mind you, at this stage
estimates are all they are.
Reply With Quote
Robin9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Robin9
Find all posts by Robin9