View Single Post
  #108   Report Post  
Old October 5th 15, 08:11 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Roland Perry Roland Perry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default TfL Taxi Consultation to "kill" Uber

In message
-septe
mber.org, at 21:18:00 on Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Recliner
remarked:
They can't get customers to book
them on the spot: the booking has to be made through Uber.

They can get the customer to book them through Uber, on the spot.

I don't think they can. You can't pick a particular vehicle to book through
Uber, can you? And Uber cars aren't marked.

That doesn't matter if you are already sat in it, talking to the driver.

How would you identify it as an Uber car?


Because the driver will have accosted you as you walked along the
pavement.


Surely that's more likely to be how an unlicensed car would behave, rather
than an Uber driver? The latter would be more likely to be automatically
spotted if he behaves in that way, and has more to lose.


Whichever is more likely, Uber drivers do it too.

As a would-be passenger, why wouldn't you simply use the app to book a
car, knowing that there are several in the vicinity? You'd do it
before even coming out on to the street.


Many people don't think that far ahead.


Huh? That's exactly how Uber customers use it.


The touts are picking up people who haven't.

Do we actually know if there actually is some illegality going on?


https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/taxis-an...ompliance-and-
enforcement


No comments?

Clifford Chance reports some infractions in #3 of this piece (from a
lobbying body, but they won't have made up the quotes):

http://uk.businessinsider.com/ubers-...ifford-chance-
fighting-to-ban-it-here-are-the-5-big-arguments-2015-10


Remind me again of who is paying Clifford Chance?


Doesn't matter, they are top-10 firm who can't be found out making up
quotes. So the things they say must be true.
--
Roland Perry