TfL Taxi Consultation to "kill" Uber
On 06/10/2015 17:05, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:55:30 on Tue, 6 Oct
2015, JNugent remarked:
Are they perhaps (in London, anyway) "checking that a driver has been
vetted". The system in other cities may well be different.
No, it isn't.
The system is exactly the same in London and the rest of E&W: the
operator has to check that drivers to whom he sub-contracts (or
provides) work are licensed and insured.
Vetting also includes criminal records....
Which, of course, a private company cannot do.
And checking insurance on the
day they join doesn't guarantee they are insured the day after.
True.
But taking the example of a taxi (a proper taxi, I mean) where the
proprietor/driver does not work for or via anyone but himself, the only
foolproof way of checking continuous insurance would be for the
licensing authority to check it every day.
That might be thought to be a bit much. But checking at least once every
few months (and ensuring that the certificate demonstrates a logical
audit trail of uninterrupted cover) is easier and less onerous.
|