January 10th 16, 08:02 AM
posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
|
|
By London's Northern Line to Battersea
e27002 aurora wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:52:44 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:
On 2016\01\09 11:40, e27002 aurora wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:20:56 GMT, Anna Noyd-Dryver
wrote:
e27002 aurora wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 18:12:08 GMT, Anna Noyd-Dryver
wrote:
My preferred solution (though I'm sure someone will tell me why it's
wrong!) would have been a low-level junction between Crossrail and H&C and
Hammersmith served by Crossrail rather than 10tph terminating at Paddington. But
now it's built the tunnels are in the wrong place for that 
That is something I considered a while back. Here are some of the
Pros:
The issue of the 10 terminating trains is solved.
Crossrail will have 14 tph terminating at Paddington. Only 10tph will
continue westward.
An altogether tragic waste.
I thought the new idea was for them to terminate and reverse at OOC, which
makes more sense?
|