
January 21st 16, 11:11 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 160
|
|
London Overground expansion
On 21/01/2016 19:24, Charles Ellson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:41:13 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2016\01\21 16:02, e27002 aurora wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:55:18 -0800 (PST), "R. Mark Clayton"
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 14:07:23 UTC, Recliner wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:38:01 +0000, e27002 aurora
wrote:
SNIP
What the Home Counties' commuters do not need is some superfluous
mayor
of an artificial county disrupting their travel arrangements.
In what sense is Greater London any more of an 'artificial county'
than any other local authority border from any time in history?
County boundaries in history tended to follow natural boundaries e.g.
the boundary between Cheshire and Lancashire used to follow the Mersey,
so closely in fact that when the meanders changed course the boundaries
stayed where they were. AFAIR no ceremonial county in what is now
modern Greater London spanned the Thames.
Kent, specifically two parts of Woolwich (i.e. North Woolwich and
another nearby bit whose name I can't recall ATM).
Very well stated. Clearly the conurbation extended south of the
Thames, but under different authorities.
Any arbitrary man-made lines on a map are artificial.
sort of by definition.
Of course, but with history and purpose.
Not really, but there are grudges between counties, and if you
arbitrarily reassign part of Lancashire to be part of Yorkshire the
people in that area are likely to find themselves host to the county
incinerator and such. Herefordshire definitely felt that they were a
conquered people in Hereford & Worcestershire. I'm not aware of this
happening with Greater London, perhaps because so much of so many
historic counties came together that no group dominated.
The strange anomaly is Middlesex, which has been entirely absorbed into
Greater London, but whose name persists in postal addresses in some
boroughs, but not others.
It's also odd that places like Bromley still pretend to be in Kent, though
at least Kent still exists, unlike Middlesex.
Only the county authority was abolished, the geographical area
remained and is still recognised except by those who wish to describe
everything in SE England as some kind of oblast/arrondissement of
London.
And of course the HQ of Surrey Council is in a London Borough.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|