London Banter - View Single Post

[email protected] · September 22nd 17, 07:41 PM posted to uk.transport.london

In article , (Someone
Somewhere) wrote:

On 22/09/2017 16:27, wrote:
In article , (Someone
Somewhere) wrote:

"Fairly comprehensive" - they've made a list of things they don't
like as grounds to refuse a license under "fit and proper". That
sounds more tenuous than comprehensive.

As I've commented elsewhere in this thread, those are very serious
matters, especially the fourth which appears to amount to criminal
behaviour.

Yet you choose to not debate the points with me, particularly the
fourth which was "failure to explain" rather than an actual
allegation of use of such software.

I agree there could be an innocent explanation for blocking regulators use
of the app. I'm sure the courts will be very interested to hear what it
might be.

--
Colin Rosenstiel