
November 21st 17, 11:03 AM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 351
|
|
Proposed trams under Cambridge
In article , wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:07:25 +0000
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:08:42 +0000 (UTC), wrote:
I'm not lentil munching hippy, but I do my bit. You clearly don't give a toss
but then you've probably only got a few decades left anyway and apparently
have
no offspring so why would you.
Depends on what route you want to argue the planet should be saved
for, the majority of living things that form a stable eco system or
one where human beings exist in ever increasing numbers and gradually
destroy everything by the demands placed on resources.
If couples only had a maximum of 2 kids we wouldn't have a spiralling world
population, in fact it would come down a bit. Unfortunately religion and
stupidity generally lead to ...
You seem to have mis-spelt "education, income, child mortality and
availability of contraception".
Nick
--
"The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
-- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996
|