On 29/04/2019 12:52, David Cantrell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:55:33PM +0000, Marland wrote:

Looks a typical case of we shall ask the interested parties but then
disagree with their views and implement
what we want anyway.

Looks more like a case of asking interested parties who then didn't come
up with anything unexpected or which hadn't already thought of.


+1

(The more jaundiced authors of major con. docs. include a detail which
they expect to change/drop in response to comments to prove they do
listen. But not worth it for this minor matter.)



--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid