"Laura-Ann" wrote in message
news:8hjCc.117$kX3.70@newsfe6-win...
"Robin Mayes" wrote in message
...

"Laura-Ann" wrote in message
news
Thanks for the replies

Guess it would make sense. Well, maybe not make
sense for them not to remove/repaint the walls -
I'm sure they have some really great excuse for that.

Is it not part of the JLE then anymore?

Why paint over something that isn't
graffiti and is still technically correct?

Perhaps there are more pressing needs to be
address, like crumbling walls or offensive graffiti?

If they're not actually doing any construction of an Underground
Extension behind those walls, then why not change it?

What would the business case be?

Maybe you could go down there on your day off and overpaint it. If you do it
neatly, no-one will mind.

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes