On 14/09/2020 20:16, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:02:11 on Mon, 14 Sep
2020, Recliner remarked:

It must be about time they dismantled the bridge for restoration and
preservation as an exhibit elsewhere (e.g. in a park) and built
something
more suitable for 21st century traffic in its place. Attempting to
repair
and maintain a structure that is barely fit for purpose is a waste of
time
and money.

Yes, that would probably be cheaper and quicker than restoring it to full
service. I wonder if they'd be allowed to build a modern, much stronger,
visually-identical replacement?

Allowed by whom: The Treasury, or Heritage England?

Either English Heritage or Historic England?

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.