
October 17th 20, 03:48 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
|
|
Congestion charge to N/S Circular??????
In message , at 14:56:41 on Sat, 17 Oct
2020, tim... remarked:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 21:11:51 on Fri, 16 Oct
2020, tim... remarked:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 17:06:48 on Fri, 16 Oct
2020, tim... remarked:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/tran...haun-bailey-ra
lly-against-extension-of-congestion-charge-zone-a4571826.html
Other media available
As a disinterested party, I can't believe that anyone is seriously
suggesting this
The N/S Circular area isn't like the central area where everyone
inside it is moderately well off, or lives in a bubble where they
can walk/bus to whatever service that they need.
People who live in the "Circular" area, are people in normal
employment with lives that mean that they have to have a car.
and an annual tax of 5,475 pounds to own one, is bloody ridiculous
That's only if you use it every day.
or if it's parked on-street
If the local councillors suggested this they would be out on their
ears at the next election
It's only because Boris is a Tory, and most of the affected LAs are
Labour/LibDem run that he has a hope of getting away with this
politically
This will be seen as the Mayor's fault,
will it?
Not convinced
so Labour will get the flack.
but it's still a bag of nonsense socially.
It's nothing to do with congestion, but simply a potential way to
raise a poll-tax the pay for TfL's huge deficit.
we know that
but why should car owners in this zone pay for it?
One reason is that they are (like it or not) under Tfl's umbrella,
and so are one of the more direct sources of income.
that's a because we can, not because we should
the original question remains.
Rather than for example imposing a council tax surcharge on everyone
in London.
Another is that if TfL has to drastically cut services it'll force
more vehicles onto the roads, inconveniencing existing motorists.
you may think that
I may think that
Non-users of PT asked to subsidise PT, don't think that
I note your disagreement on pretty much anything. Perhaps we can agree
that by default we disagree, and save a lot of typing?
--
Roland Perry
|