Thread: Dangers of High Speed Trains Pushed from the Rear
View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old November 12th 04, 06:43 AM posted to misc.transport.rail.europe,uk.railway,uk.transport.london
BH Williams BH Williams is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Default Dangers of High Speed Trains Pushed from the Rear

"David Hansen" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:12:56 +0000 someone who may be Clive Coleman
wrote this:-

Such an interlock appears to have been common since the 1960s.
Not on the 6300s, 800s,1000s,7000s,9500s,1600s or any steam engine I
ever worked on.

Were any of them designed in the late 1950s or 1960s?


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
I don't know if it's significant, but I don't believe any of the classes
that Clive notes were designed for multiple (rather than tandem) operation.
Brian


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote