Dave Liney wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 24 Nov 2004:
There is nothing wrong with that suggestion. But when there isn't a business
case for two terminals then one will have to close. Closing StP isn't an
option (it would make the CTRL phase 2 rather pointless) so Waterloo has to.
Granted - but I think you'll find that the whole point of the argument
is that there *is* a business case for two terminals. This is what we
are disagreeing with - the necessity of closing Waterloo International.
We reckon that there would be sufficient passenger numbers to make
retaining it worthwhile, AS WELL AS the new terminus at St Pancras.
--
"Mrs Redboots"
http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/
Website updated 22 November 2004