View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old February 17th 05, 09:12 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Brimstone Brimstone is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default district, circle and hammersmith and city lines - reorganisation idea

TheOneKEA wrote:
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:

Signal spacing is chosen to meet various requirements, including
maximum throughput of trains. For example, on LU there are usually
several signals approaching a station, because this allows a train
to draw up close as the previous train departs. This is *better*
than spacing the signals further apart, but could mean that there
are four or five red signals behind a train under some
circumstances.


I've seen numerous examples of this around the system and guessed that
the rationale was something similar to what you've just stated.


or only hold one signal in rear of the signal
protecting an obstruction at danger.


Why? If one red signal can protect the obstruction, what's the need
for more?


You just showed that under certain circumstances, one signal is not
enough to protect an obstruction (or at least I think you did...)


You only need one signal to proect an obstruction. Additional signals mean
that a following train can enter a platform more closely behind the one
departing whilst still maintaining a safe distance between them.