David Splett wrote:
"Boltar" wrote in message
ups.com...
Is this an operational restriction or a physical one? If its the
former surely some special operational plan could be put into force?

It's both. The signalling was not designed to allow it to happen, so
you could only do it by working (and securing) the points manually.


So PG IMR doesn't support remote securing then? If it did, one could
stretch the rules and use it to lock the northbound-to-siding crossover.