Sarah Czepiel wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:46:08 +0100, sharky wrote:
Sarah Czepiel wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:09:11 +0100, sharky wrote:
Yes. We stomped a mud hole in the "arse" of the British not that long
ago.
Where was that then? When you backed us so fully in the Falklands? How
many troops did you send?
This will save you quite a bit of time.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=50104
In proving you did '**** all'
My question was 'How many troops did you send'
The answer seems to be 'NONE'
You asked THREE questions:
1.Where was that then?
2. When you backed us so fully in the Falklands?
3. How many troops did you send?
I answered ALL THREE with my site, ya goofy ****.
And all the answers were '**** all use'
Why don't you grasp the fact that
Wars with America only - failure
America plus allies - half a chance
America not involved - win.
Your ****ing lightweight and a liability.
" Other researchers have confirmed the "supportive maintenance"
efforts of the U.S. of fuel, missiles, etc*, and Pres Reagan did offer
such military aid as mentioned below....."
"Although never officially acknowledged there are reports that during
the conflict the United States offered Britain the loan of a US Navy
aircraft carrier should the worst happen to either Invincible or
Hermes"
Oh great, IF you lose your aircraft carrier, you can borrow one of ours,
but you'll have to drive it yourselves!
Your RN isn't capable of operating a sophisticated air craft carrier?
In that case I'm very glad you didn't need one of ours.
Oh **** off! Give someone the keys to battleship and say 'safe driving
guys'. Do you know how long it would take to train all the sailors to
use the new systems? Please, grow up.
We all know what happened to your USS Yorktown
http://wired-vig.wired.com/news/tech...,13987,00.html
think we'd let our sailors loose in one of you piece of ****e toys?
It'd be more likely to blow one of our own boats out of the water:
http://members.aol.com/amerwar/ff/ff.htm
**** me, I only looked that up to spite you, but god you ARE scarey!
Minimum of 18% (Korea) casualties due to 'friendly fire' rising to 49%
YES 49% thats one less than ****ing 50% due to it! in Persian Gulf.
****, why not just shoot 25% of your troops and NOT GO!
You'd win then!
You scary, scary *******.
Join the US military and get shot by a mate. Lovely.
Oh, on a finishing note
"We will not be afraid of terrorists"
"No US personnel allowed inside the Greater London area"
Would be funny if not so lame.
You're only here because hardy injections of spunk from the US of A
kept your grandmothers legs open.
Paid for with stockings and chocolate.
Did your dad buy your mum the same way, great chat up line.
She wouldn't have looked at the sweaty turd otherwise.
Now go get ****ed Sweetie, seriously. It'll improve your disposition
and clear up your skin problem.
Personal insult, always the refuge of the mentally and factually
challenged. Bring it on.