Thread: More bombs?
View Single Post
  #92   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 12:55 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
G.Feldsham. G.Feldsham. is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Default More bombs?


"Tony Polson" wrote in message
...
(Neil Williams) wrote:
[1] Difficult with suicide bombers, of course. That said, the
security measures some people are suggesting might stop people being
blown up in Tube trains. It won't stop them being blown up while
waiting in a queue for security outside a busy Tube station, for
example, and it won't stop a suicide van bomb in the middle of Oxford
Street on a Saturday afternoon. If one avenue is closed to the
terrorists, they'll simply find another.



Football matches, cinemas, department stores, supermarkets,
restaurants, educational institutions ... they are all easy targets
for terror.

Slightly less easy, but very vulnerable to small airborne attacks with
light aircraft are ... our nuclear power stations.

Plus there are dirty bombs - nuclear devices that release massive
radiation rather than powerful explosions, chemical and biological
weapons of all kinds. They can be detonated almost anywhere.

So was it worth going to war in Iraq, Mr Bliar?


Well, about two million of us did march, begging him not to make this
mistake.
As Pandora's box, the lifted lid of Iraq revealed much that was much better
hid.

When's he going to resign, to be suddenly and unexpectedly assasinated by a
suicide bomber who in the future some time steps out of the shadows in
Umbria, or Sicily, or Paris...?

GF.