Thread: Victoria Revamp
View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old September 8th 05, 12:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Colin Rosenstiel Colin Rosenstiel is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
Default Victoria Revamp

In article ,
(Michael Hopkins) wrote:

Much as it might pain me to agree with her, the new MP for Putney is
not wrong. The District Line ran 8-car Q, CP and R stock trains until
the 1970s. The platforms, give or take a bit of selective door
opening, are all long enough, except between High St Ken and Edgware
Road where shorter trains have always been used. So, if the eventual
D stock replacements were 8 car length (car lengths as C and earlier
stocks) there would be a worthwhile increase in capacity.


Fair point, but that would involve re-arranging the timetable/line
permutations because of Wimbleware, so if you're throwing that kind of
idea around, I guss anything's possible!


Why? Wimbleware trains are already shorter than main District line
trains are.

The switch to 7 car CO/CP and R stock trains was to avoid uncoupling I
thought as there wasn't enough stock for all District main line trains
to be 8 cars. The D stock order then fossilised those limited capacity
arrangements. But with D stock to be replaced under the PPP the
possibility of longer trains again is perfectly feasible.

--
Colin Rosenstiel