View Single Post
  #124   Report Post  
Old November 6th 05, 09:53 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Clive Page Clive Page is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 42
Default New fares from 2 January 2006 - pdf

In message , Clive
writes

I don't understand the problem. I live 350 miles from London yet my
five or six trips a year there make oyster a good proposition, no
queuing, lower fares and capping. Then again I don't mind that
someone in TfL takes an interest in my London based movements to
improve services, it can only benefit me. I've nothing to hide
either, my card is registered to me at my home address, so if I am
robbed of it or lose it whilst in London I can get a refund. So I am
happy to keep up to £90 on it in pre-pay, then I'm never caught out.


I live only 30 miles from London and make a trip every week or two, but
have not so far been tempted by Oyster. I see two main problems

(1) I don't like the idea of having to register my details, so that
every journey I take is known to TFL. That smacks just a bit to much
like big brother for my liking. If I use an unregistered card and lose
it then I lose all the stored value (as I understand it).

(2) I've seen far too many stories of people finding unresolved journeys
for a whole variety of reasons, and then it takes them a huge amount of
time to get the excess charge refunded. I often transfer from mainline
rail (which doesn't use Oyster) to tube at places like Kings Cross
Thameslink, Farringdon, Moorgate, or Blackfriars where it is hard (or
impossible) to find an Oyster machine to touch in to, so I expect that
using one will be a frequent waste of time and maybe money.

All the same, now that Carnet tickets are to disappear, as soon as our
current stocks are exhausted (maybe late next year) I may be forced to
indulge in an Oyster of some sort.

Any comments?

--
Clive Page