On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:09:33 +0000, David Bradley
wrote:

www.tfwl.org.uk - a site that has quickly established itself to
have exceptional credibility and well thought out responses

You still haven't answered Kev's question: "Where is the evidence to
support this assertion?"

I ask simply what kind of evidence do you want,

You must have some way of knowing that your website is considered to
"have exceptional credibility and well thought out responses". Simply
tell us how you know.

I have enough to fill hundreds of lines in this thread. If I give one
example, or more, you will find reasons why that is not good enough;

If the examples are satisfactory, then if anyone finds reasons why
they are not good enough, said reasons would be unconvincing, and
would be disregarded by readers - and of course, this being an open
group, you (and others) would have the opportunity to refute them.

As a direct result of the web site I
have had invitations to speak at conferences and requests to attend forums and
committee meetings of those that are the "shakers and movers" of transport
policy.

Care to give any examples?

You would do well to note that general statements such as these may be
considered dubious unless backed up with names and facts. For example,
on your web site, you state that "the opinion of the country's largest
group of professional transport planners is that the best option for
most places is trolleybuses". I constructively suggest that you add
the name of this group to that sentence, and possibly a direct quote
from a spokesman or report, as this would add great weight to its
credibility.