asdf said:

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:35:12 +0000, David Bradley
wrote:


Our proposals go much deeply than that but clearly
you are not interested in the detail.

You have not been so kind as to furnish us with any of the "deeper"
detail.

Your website spends many pages and thousands of words rubbishing the
tram scheme (or just trams in general), but says very little about
this detailed scheme you say you are proposing instead.

Yes. I've said it before, but it still bears repeating. David's whole
chain of reasoning seems to be based on:

a) TfL's tram scheme is flawed.
b) His trolleybus scheme isn't TfL's tram scheme.
c) Therefore, his trolleybus scheme can't be flawed.

He then spends all his arguing points (a) and (b), even though we all
agree with him about those. But, he does nothing at all to convince us
about point (c), which is the part that's bothering us.