) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

So you think that crossing tower bridge late at night at 32mph is a
heinous crime too do you ?

Did I say that? I did not.

I think if you re-read my reply, you'll find that I actually implied that I
am far from averse to treating speed limit signs as advisory, but when I DO
get nicked, I don't whinge about it.

What you may find is that I've not actually censured the OP for the
"crime" - merely for his laughable stupidity in thinking he's got fair
grounds for appeal. He hasn't. He was nicked, fair and square, for an
offence he admits committing with premeditation. Yet he wants to appeal...