View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old January 21st 06, 01:55 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Aidan Stanger Aidan Stanger is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2004
Posts: 263
Default Why can't the Transport for London model be more widely applied

Bob wrote:

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/local...682621,00.html

The Guardian article indicates that local government reform may be on
the way in the form of City Regions. It sounds like deja vu all over
again for Greater Manchester although local politicians have
reservations about a directly elected mayor like London's "Red Ken" -
although the colour seems to have faded.Whilst not going along with
many of his views I have always been impressed with the way he has
through, Transport for London, been an innovative force - driving
forward the Docklands Light Railway,


Including an extension under the Thames which will be virtually emptied
once a more direct route is built.

the East London Line extension,


That's been driven forward??? They must be driving very slowly?

the congestion charge ( particularly putting the surpluses back into
transport infrastructure.)


That has been a big success so far, but few other places have the
suitable conditions for a self funding scheme like that to succeed.

and a sensible system for regulating the buses.


That one predates TfL.

Outside of London the eight major city regions are generally
groaning with congestion on a crumbly infrastructure so perhaps relief
might be in sight.
But now I wonder - is there a catch?


More to the point, will it really make funding for light rail schemes
more readily available?

--
Aidan Stanger
http://www.bettercrossrail.co.uk