View Single Post
  #44   Report Post  
Old September 15th 03, 10:27 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Cast_Iron Cast_Iron is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Default DLR Service Disruption

Mait001 wrote:
If he is getting up the noses of the politicians to the
point where they are wanting to take specific action to
remove him he is hardly being "indolent and useless".


Parliament wasting time, which could be more usefully
spent, in getting rid of this eyesore, is hardly, I would
suggest "useful".


You really ought to try seeing the big picture.


If no one will give him a job then he is at least causing
political discomfort to others at a cost of physical
discomfort to himself. Again hardly "indolent and useless".


If he is unable to fulfil the basic requirements of being
employed, i.e. attending work instead of sitting in
Parliament Square most of the day, then it this that makes
him unemployable.


Highly unlikely since by being there he is making himself unavailable for
work and would therefore have his Jobseekers Allowance stopped. It is
possible that he has health problems that causes potential employers not to
offer him a job.


Someone who sits on their backside at home however,
complaining about people who make their voice heard is
almost certainly "indolent and useless".


I, unlike the object of this thread, am up "off my
backside" by 6.30a.m. most mornings and (traffic and trains
allowing) on my way to wrl by 7.30am. and often not home
till 8 or 9p.m. For why? So that I can provide for me and
mine, and also, seemingly, to provide for the no-hoped
already rferred to.

At least HE cannot think me "indolent" or "useless" since
without me and those of my ilk he would die of starvation.


Did someone suggest your were indolent?