Thread
:
Anti-bike signs on Bendibuses
View Single Post
#
2
March 25th 06, 08:28 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Colin Rosenstiel
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
Anti-bike signs on Bendibuses
In article ,
(Richard J.) wrote:
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article ,
(Richard J.) wrote:
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article ,
(Martin Underwood) wrote:
The cyclist shouldn't *be* on the nearside of the vehicle when it
is indicating to turn left. As a car driver I usually pull close
to the kerb when I'm turning left if I've just overtaken a
cyclist, so as to block him making this dangerous manouvre; as a
cyclist I never overtake anything on the driver's blind side!
Other way round IME. The vehicle turning left should not overtake
the cyclist to do so.
Yes, that's Highway Code rule 158.
Worse, they can't even see what they are doing. Any vehicle like
that should not be allowed on the roads.
I assume you mean that once the driver starts a turn, he can't see
all of the vehicle in his mirrors. In what way is a bendy bus
different from an articulated lorry in that regard, or would you
ban all of them too?
Like railway practices and designs found to be dangerous I would
require changes to overcome the safety defects. Most railway lines
had to be fitted with TPWS to prevent SPADs and bufferstop
collisions and all the Mark I rolling stock had to be withdrawn
from service within quite a short time because it wasn't
crashworthy enough, for example.
I wasn't aware that articulated lorries had been "found to be
dangerous". Do you have any accident statistics to support this?
Two Cambridge accidents in the last few months in which cyclists were
killed by drivers who claim not to have seen them on their nearsides.
The lorries were turning left, one on a roundabout at Addenbrooke's
Hospital, the other at a T junction off a main road with a cycle lane on
the nearside.
There is no question in my mind that both drivers should have seen the
cyclists and if they couldn't then their vehicles were defective and
should not be allowed on the roads nor should similar vehicles unless
modified.
--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply With Quote
Colin Rosenstiel
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Colin Rosenstiel