SteveH wrote:
Stephen Farrow wrote:

SteveH wrote:
Stephen Farrow wrote:

SteveH wrote:
Stephen Farrow wrote:

The phrases "worth reading" and "by Jeremy Clarkson" do not belong in
the same sentence.
Have you actually read any of his work?
Yes I have, thank you.
The books, or the newspaper rants?
Both. He's a hack.
And you have no sense of humour.
Really? I have no sense of humour because I fail to appreciate the
burblings of a hack writer whose work cynically panders to the lowest
common denominator?

Clarkson's books and columns amply demonstrate that he wouldn't
recognise genuine wit if it sat on his face. The fact that you're
engaging in such a spirited defence of such a ****-poor excuse for a
writer strongly suggests that neither, unfortunately, would you.

I actually doubt you've done any extensive reading of Clarkson's writing
given that you appear to hate him so much.

Then you would be wrong (and I don't "hate" him - he's not worth the
effort), a state with which I imagine you are *quite* familiar.


--

Stephen

Philippa: Can we make this brew fairly speedy? I'm
worried about the traffic.
Twinkle: Well, I'm worried about burning me flipping mouth.
I've got a sex life to think of, you know.