Thread
:
Thank you First, for nearly getting me killed last night.
View Single Post
#
26
October 8th 06, 01:18 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
jonmorris
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 38
Thank you First, for nearly getting me killed last night.
wrote:
As there was a child involved I would have called the police in any
case. I'm not sure that pulling the alarm achieved much. Why did you
choose that course of action?
Because I thought I'd get to speak to the driver, who could call the
police (which is what I said I'd do). The train DID stop, but when
reset we continued to Hatfield and a) nobody had been called b) the
doors were opened to let any offender off.
With hindsight (a wonderful thing) I should have called 999. I wrongly
assumed the passenger alarm was the thing to go for (the new stickers
DO say to use it for illness, harrassment etc).
To clarify a few more things;
1) The driver was male (I saw him as I was already sitting on the
train).
2) BTP at Kings Cross, where I've been asked to go next week to make a
full statement, confirmed the two people would have been security
guards (she mentioned the name of the company, but I don't remember it)
on contract with First Capital Connect.
3) As I had no lasting injury, they were very keen to dissuade me from
going any further. I declined to let it go. The main part of the report
will be on the woman that assaulted me - not so much the action of the
train operator or hired guards - which I'll try and get an explanation
of from First.
4) The BTP woman I spoke to yesterday admitted she wouldn't travel on
the late services from Kings Cross because they have all sorts of
trouble. Makes you think!
I can understand that. Given that you had already been involved in an
altercation with them, having you go back near them to give your
version of events was only ever going to exacerbate the situation.
Yes, this wasn't wise. However, the guards needed to know WHY I'd
pulled the alarm, as I am sure (as mentioned) that they thought it was
because I was drunk.
Once again, as there is a child involved, I'd have dialled 999. So far
as railway staff are concerned, why would you wish to speak to the
driver, rather than the members of staff with whom you dealt?
If you call for aid, the driver can arrange for BTP to meet the train.
I never got that chance. The alarm was reset and the train continued
without any intention of calling the police. So, while saying I was
going to call the police, the guards had other ideas. I did call as
soon as I got home instead, to report the assault on myself, rather
than to deal with the incident on the train. Threatening to kill people
is an arrestable offence as far as I am aware.
I think that you are probably right, but you could still report it to
Hertfordshire Police. There is still the issue that there is a couple
who were behaving aggressively and drunkenly while responsible for a
child. Is there CCTV in the area? If so, you might still get afollow
up, particularly if the couple are known to the police locally. It
would have been better to act at the time, but it's still not too late.
No CCTV on 365s (ironic as the older stock now does) and no CCTV at
Hatfield. Possibly something of where they boarded at Kings Cross of
Finsbury Park. I am quite hopeful that the police will identify them.
I realise that you are upset, but that's bad advice. If decent people
don't try to help what chance is there? The likelihood is that the
people who were being abused and threatened prior to your involvement
are, in fact, grateful to you, just as, I am sure, you would be
grateful to someone who intervened to try to help you.
I am always being told off for getting involved, with the point made
that one day I'll be put in hospital - or worse. This is the nearest
things have come to it happening, so I'm sorry but much as I have a
conscience, I don't think I can see myself ever getting involved again.
No wonder so many others in society won't. I recall the stories of
people murdered for getting yobs to stop throwing stones, damaging
property etc.
As a matter of interest, how do you think that this should have
beenhandled?
The police should have been asked to attend. Yes, it would have annoyed
other passengers wanting to get home. Yes, it may have caused First to
have a late train arrival at Peterborough. The police need to be aware
of this 'family' that could well carry out their threats in the future
on myself or anyone else they don't get on with.
I've got a chance to speak to the police this week (and will be), and
also to pass my concerns about the security company used with First at
a later date.
Jonathan
Reply With Quote
jonmorris
View Public Profile
Find all posts by jonmorris