View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old October 24th 06, 08:53 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Dave Arquati Dave Arquati is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 191
Default Ease of interchange on the tube

MIG wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote:
asdf wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:19:12 +0100, Dave Arquati wrote:

I'm amazed that Victoria doesn't have a "next train to Clapham Junction"
display - unless it's so obvious that I've missed it.
It does have a "Next fastest train to..." display, but Clapham
Junction isn't on it:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Im...5-10-24_06.jpg

Yes - it's extremely stupid that it doesn't have CJ on it.

Actually, with these boards, I wonder whether they just work on the
timetable data or whether they account for delays to departing trains.
Personally I wouldn't expect them to be clever enough...




The ones on SET at places like Lewisham certainly don't cope. They
will tell you that the next train to London Bridge is coming at
whatever time the next scheduled train is likely to eventually turn up,
regardless of whether several undelayed ones might be going there
sooner. Even to the extent of showing that the next train to London
Bridge is cancelled, which doesn't really help with when the next one
is.

So it seems to work out when the next scheduled train is and then
simply repeat its expected time or cancelled status, with no reference
to any other trains coming sooner.

Shame - you'd think it would be easy enough to take the number of
minutes delayed, add it to the calculated London Bridge arrival time,
and then work out which train is fastest using that...

--
Dave Arquati
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London