View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 14th 07, 12:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected] Mait001@aol.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Default Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti


Tristán White wrote:

" wrote in
ps.com:

BIG SNIP
Get a life.



As those here who know me on a social level can testament, I certainly do
have a life. And one I live to the full (too much, some may say).

I appreciate modern conceptual art for what it is and some of that includes
graffiti art. Yes, I do have "Wall and Piece" by Banksy and I have even
been to a Banksy event. I also read on the tube, occasionally watch films
on my PSP too, but I can also appreciate some great art in the form of
graffiti on a disused siding.

And to answer another reply on this thread, if Banksy came and stencilled
one of his artworks on my front wall, no I would not be ****ed off in the
slightest. You may find that hard to believe. I don't care, to be honest.


Tristan, whilst I am the first to defend someone's personal expression
and enjoyment of freedom (whether that is to paint in an asinine way or
for others to enjoy such visual concoctions) that really isn't the
point is it? The real point is that it is uncivilised (to say nothing
of criminality) to take a paint brush or spray can and use it on
property that does not belong to one, or over which one has no
perimission to paint. To that extent, I refuse to accept that the
product of such activity is "art".

Once one goes down the path of allowing the end (though I would
disagree that the "end" in this instance is anything but visually
unappealing, but that's just my opinion) to justify the means, you end
up with some very dangerous results. You may not like plain brick walls
- to wit your reference to "boring" journeys. Well, actually, I do. I
am far more impressed by the engineering skills and hard work of
Victorian navvies who built our railways and whose work has stood the
test of time, and to marvel at their brickwork, than the graffitii
vandals who despoil the brickwork. So, whose preference should prevail?

Well if those "artists" are so popular and have a following, of which
you seem to be one, then let them have their work exhibited, have
prints made, books published etc. If they have a large enouhg
following, they will do well financially and good luck to them. Then,
your thirst for such "art" can be quenched, and leave those of us who
enjoy plain, unadulterated brickwork to do so.

But, for Heaven's sake don't attempt to justify their criminality -
trespass, criminal damage and, presumably, unlawfully purchasing (or
stealing) spray paints if underage.

And, just suppose you had a treasured and unique piece of "Banksy's"
work on your wall at home. Are you really saying that you would not
mind some lesser-known graffiti vandal using his spray can over
"Banksy's" masterpiece? That seems to me to be the logical conclusion
of the strange attitude you express.

Marc.