View Single Post
  #78   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 07, 07:31 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.rec.subterranea,uk.transport.london
Peter Masson Peter Masson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 559
Default Secret Tube Trains under London?


"Graeme Wall" wrote

More to the point, the Victoria line was deep enough that subsidence was

not
though to be a problem. Also the legal situation had been clarified. ie

you
don't own the land under your property, unlike the USA. This enables the
Government to sell off the mineral rights.

AIUI you do own the land under your property. But parliament has
nationalised mineral rights, so you don't own those, and is willing to grant
compulsory purchase powers for a wayleave for a new underground railway. If
it goes under your property you'll be paid for the wayleave, but it won't be
very much as it will be assumed you don't have any other use for the land.

Peter