On May 15, 6:52 pm, MIG wrote:
On May 15, 6:44 pm, MIG wrote:





On May 15, 6:25 pm, asdf wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2007 13:22:43 +0100, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:

Unless I've misunderstood something, according to a recent post
) and thread, there is a connection
from the fast lines to Watford, and it's currently being moved further
south.

You've misunderstood.

Fast -----#####---------*------*--------#####-------
Moor Park / / Rickmansworth
Slow -----#####----*--/ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
*
|
# Croxley
|

Each line represents a double track.

So where are the "connections from the fast lines to the slow lines
just south of where the Met line splits into the Watford and
Rickmansworth routes" described in the message I cited? Is it just a
mistake? (South being left on the above diagram

Use of the term "south" could be causing confusion, because Moor Park
to Rickmansworth is east - west. Everything is south of the Watford
branch. In the diagram, left is actually east, with south at the top.

I don't know what was meant, but going from Moor Park to
Rickmansworth, between the junctions with the South (ie east) and
North (ie west) Curves, the fast and slow lines join together, and
that is south of the Watford line

So I think it's more (adapting the previous diagram)

Fast -----#####-----*------*-----------#####-------
Moor Park / / Rickmansworth
Slow -----#####--/ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
*
|
# Croxley
|-



I give up, it keeps wonking. I don't know how it's coming out in
various fonts.