View Single Post
  #43   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 10:24 AM
traveller traveller is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2007
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hoffman
Of course this means the burden of proof is on the defendant rather than
TfL.
--
Michael Hoffman
But i always thought that a defendant was innocent until proven guilty!

It also begs the question, why do TFL seem to be pursuing prosecutions in an overwhelming number of cases now, rather than simply issuing penalty fares, as they have for the best part of the twenty five years that these laws have been in existance?

Last edited by traveller : June 1st 07 at 10:35 AM